soul_mods: (Default)
Soul Campaign Moderation Journal ([personal profile] soul_mods) wrote in [community profile] soul_ooc2011-10-22 08:12 pm
Entry tags:

MODPOST 1/2

Attention, Soul Campaign!

We’re opening reservations in a little over a week, and the mods would like to make some announcements regarding changes being made to the application and reservation process. These changes have been in planning for a long time, and is one of the reasons why we went for the break.

Reserves Page and Application Cut Off
The reserves page will open on November 1, 2011 as planned. The application cycle will be from December 16 - 23, 2011. Cut-off for next cycle will be December 15, 2011, 11:59pm EST.

Changes to the application form
We made some changes to the application form, which you can see here. The sections remain the same, but the text explaining these changes have been revised to make them clearer and more streamlined. We’ve included a secondary reference page linked in the application, which includes guidelines that will hopefully make the application easier for players to fill and the application cycle/process much faster than what we’ve been doing before.

We changed the weapon section so that weapons will only have one general ability. There will be a separate post to detail how this will affect current weapons (but don’t panic, we’re not going to make you change yours if you don’t want to).

Last, a summary of the events in the game since its beginning up til the Europe event has been posted in this page.

New revision process for the applications
Starting the next cycle, we will no longer entertain revisions for the Character Information section of the application. This section includes the character’s history, personality, abilities, and weaknesses. We feel that players who know their characters well should be able to write their applications in a manner that makes this section understandable to the application team. Any application whose character information section the application team finds lacking will immediately be rejected.

The other sections (SC-only section, meister, weapon, soul description, samples) will go through the usual revision process if necessary, since they are all sections unique to Soul Campaign.

Beta-reading system
However, since we will no longer be allowing revisions for the character information during the application cycle, we will be offsetting this with a beta-reading system to help players make sure that their applications pass the standards of the game.

How will this work? In the reserves page, the applicants commenting on it will have the option of asking for a beta-reader from SC’s pool of current players. You can volunteer to beta-read theirs and help them with their applications by replying to their reserve comment.

We’d also like to minimize the risk of applicants asking for a beta-reader and not getting any -- to do this, the mods will be collecting names of people willing to be included in a pool of beta-readers every cycle, and we will assign them to a lonely applicant.

If you’d like to volunteer, please reply here, and indicate any preferences (or non-preferences, for that matter!) on series or canon that you have. We appreciate it! App team members may also volunteer, but this doesn’t guarantee that the app will pass.

Test drive meme
We will also test something for next cycle. We will put up a Test Drive Meme in Soul Skirmish, to be linked to the reserves page. This will give the prospective applicants and the current players space to tag each other before the application cycle, to give the applicants a taste of the game before they come in.

The meme will include several scenarios that the characters can play out, depending on their choice. Some will be serious, while some will be more light-hearted. Soul Campaign is a plot-heavy game that depends on consistent relations and interactions between characters, as well as emphasis on world news and events; we’d like the applicants to be more aware of this as they app into the game.

Please note that threads in this meme will not be accepted for Activity Check. Sorry. :c

Whew!
So that’s it for changes! Please note that the new revision process, beta-reading system, and test drive meme are all still under testing for now, and we may adjust them depending on how December pans out. We appreciate your patience!

The second mod post will be up soon after this, so make sure to check it out, especially if you have weapon characters.

For questions about this post (and its links), you can ask here or email us at soulcampaign@gmail.com. (Don't worry if some questions take a while to answer, a couple of the mods are going on a short vacation for a couple of days. Thank you for your patience!)

[identity profile] hatedriven.livejournal.com 2011-10-24 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
popping in to say that i can understand why everyone seems to be lashing out at the idea of outright rejection. however, i don't think it's all that unreasonable. the personality section has always been about who your character is and what drives them, and i think that most often the problems arise in turning it into a history section instead of a personality section. apps, in recent times, have turned into essays about characters and admittedly not everyone is as good at essay writing as they are at roleplaying. plus, this discrepancy isn't always easy to see, having beta'd an app before that in turn needed revisions to the personality after i'd said it was good for this game. in this respect, i think that the betas could take a lot of flack for it, and though i didn't, i still felt guilt over it. however, i think the only reason this could be a big deal is because the people beta'ing in the apps will have been appointed in-game and therefore could be solely held responsible for the app teams' decision (which is ridiculous, i know, but i'm confident it could happen). i've never been part of an ingame beta system before though so i can't speak to prior experience and draw from that.

to circumvent this i think, perhaps, it should be shown that applications are quality over quantity. it's entirely possible to write a decent application without going into eight pages of 12point font over it. when apping into this game for the first time, i too, eyeballed the other apps to see what was acceptable. i know we used to have examples up, but in checking the application page i didn't see any. i think this would be a good thing to toss up, so people will have something to work off of instead of hunting around.

however, i think i am in the minority when i say i don't find this update to be unreasonable and overtly intimdating, not after actually looking at it, and reading over the application a second time. soul campaign has always prided itself on having a group of players that are thoughtful and dedicated, and unlike other games, is more about how your character grows in this verse, which is what you seem to be focusing on. any of us who have really wanted to get in, and wanted to stick around, have stuck it to the man and managed well enough. but then again, i've always loved a challenge. that, and i imagine you all put quite a bit of thought into this before handing it out for us all to look at.

in short, you have my support, but some examples would be a good idea.

[identity profile] novelvision.livejournal.com 2011-10-24 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
This is something that I can second. I think it'll be less intimidating overall to players if there are samples to show what to look for, divided into categories of good apps for say, major characters, important (But less important) characters and minor characters. I think a sample of each type would be good so that people don't think that they have to write too much for a minor character as long as they have the personality down.
mumyo_ken: (Default)

[personal profile] mumyo_ken 2011-10-25 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
As long as the make sure the samples come from apps that were not revised. You can't give someone a sample that was tailored by advice from the mods, quite frankly. Not because it doesn't show what the app teams want, but because it's false advertising at this point.

[identity profile] novelvision.livejournal.com 2011-10-25 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope, all of the samples I was thinking of in this case were approved by all of the app team members and the mods and were from previous app cycles. So that does come underneath the 'no-tailoring' thing, because that would be biased.