The no revisions clause is all of it, to be honest. Revisions are always part of apping and allow for small mistakes to be corrected and misunderstands to be worked out. Seeing that there is no chance to fix those mistakes, especially with the long window before you can app again is a huge deterrence and adds an addition level of anxiety and stress to the process. Even if you say here that small things will be over looked, in most app processes they aren't. Unless the person looking at that app has the assurance that the usual and frequent revision calls won't cause them to be rejected, they're going to assume it's business as usual, just with no chance to tailor what they've written to expectations they weren't aware of because there's always something that gets missed or misunderstood.

And personally, I'd rather have the longer instructions as a general thing. I'm hoping the guidelines you guys are putting together will replace them because it can be very hard sometimes to figure out how sections are to be filled out, like how the strengths and weakness sections always are very hard since half the time they're redundant and tend to be just lists (thank you for making that optional, BTW. BIG improvement!) This goes double for the no 2nd chance addition.