Thanks for your consideration, but I think you are still misunderstanding me a bit. My problem with it as example is not as much about the explanation of the ability being too complicated (I can understand and fully respect you for wanting to keep things close to canon!), but rather that it comes off as an expert explaining the confusing inner mechanics of a very complicated machine while forgetting to ever mention what he is actually talking about. It could be a hair-dryer, a racing car or a missile! The explanation is good, but because an important detail is missing it is still difficult to understand what is being talked about to anybody who isn’t an expert as well.
TL;Dr: What is Jade's ability in Weapon form? What can the Meister do by wearing the demon glasses? That - the most important - part is not mentioned in the example and is what I’d really love to know if I were to turn to it for help as a player wanting to app. Without this information, it is hard to tell whether it is an example for a 'normal' or an 'elemental' Weapon,too - I still wouldn’t know if you hadn't told me. If you can add a line that says that it is meant as an example for a Weapon with elemental powers (as opposed to the second example) and another one that says what his Weapon form can actually do the example would be good in my opinion!
…Of course this is only my two cents on the matter. I don't mean to blame or lecture you about how to fill a part of your app, my only concern is with its use as an example that is officially used. I think that a lot of make or break of what this new changes bring will depend on how good things are being explained and easily understood examples are core points for that. Sorry for nagging!
no subject
TL;Dr: What is Jade's ability in Weapon form? What can the Meister do by wearing the demon glasses? That - the most important - part is not mentioned in the example and is what I’d really love to know if I were to turn to it for help as a player wanting to app. Without this information, it is hard to tell whether it is an example for a 'normal' or an 'elemental' Weapon,too - I still wouldn’t know if you hadn't told me. If you can add a line that says that it is meant as an example for a Weapon with elemental powers (as opposed to the second example) and another one that says what his Weapon form can actually do the example would be good in my opinion!
…Of course this is only my two cents on the matter. I don't mean to blame or lecture you about how to fill a part of your app, my only concern is with its use as an example that is officially used. I think that a lot of make or break of what this new changes bring will depend on how good things are being explained and easily understood examples are core points for that. Sorry for nagging!